Catchwords:

CORPORATIONS – whether an extension order made under s 459R needs to specify a definite period within which an application to wind up in insolvency must be determined – whether the primary judge erred in refusing to amend the extension order to specify a date by using the slip rule – whether the effect of s 459R(3) was to dismiss the Liquidators’ alternative application to wind up on other grounds pursuant to s 461(1)(c) – whether it is inappropriate for the Liquidators, as creditors, to apply to wind up a company under s 461(1)(c) – whether the winding up proceeding was an abuse of process – whether the winding up proceeding should have been dismissed for want of prosecution