Catchwords:

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – where the applicant seeks review of a “decision” made by the Administrative Review Tribunal (the ART) – where both the applicant and first respondent agree the ART erred in finding that it did not have jurisdiction on review to determine any or all supports included in the applicant’s Statement of Participant Supports (SOPS) throughout the period from when the applicant’s Participant Plan commenced up until the date of the last decision made on remitter under s 42D of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) (the AAT Act) – whether a Participant Plan made under Division 2 of Chapter 3 of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) (NDIS Act) and as “varied” by a decision made pursuant to s 42D of the AAT Act is a “new” Participant Plan for the purposes of the NDIS Act