Catchwords:

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — jurisdictional error — procedural fairness — where District Court refused application to re-examine complainant on conviction appeal — where prosecution case depended on evidence of complainant — whether refusal amounted to denial of procedural fairness

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — jurisdictional error —relevant considerations — whether District Court failed to take into account matters supportive of applicant’s case

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — jurisdictional error — irrelevant consideration — whether District Court incorrectly assumed existence of evidence corroborating complainant’s account — whether District Court failed to take into account evidence inconsistent with complainant’s account

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — jurisdictional error — whether District Court failed to consider all elements of offence — whether sufficient evidence to find conduct was “towards” another person — whether sufficient evidence to find defendant knew of lack of consent